Monday, November 9, 2026

He Fought for Canada, But Was Never Given the Same Freedom at Home: Remembering Corporal Alexander Brass #INDIGPOLI



 

He Fought for Canada, But Was Never Given the Same Freedom at Home: Remembering Corporal Alexander Brass

November 8 – Indigenous Veterans Day





November 8 – Indigenous Veterans Day

By Joshua Brass Fraser | IndigPoli

There is a photograph I keep coming back to.

It is a photograph of Cree men from the File Hills community in Saskatchewan, some in military uniform, others gathered alongside them. Among the men identified in the photograph is my great-grandfather, Corporal Alexander Brass.

File Hills Indians leaving for WW1 w/ Alexander Brass

He is there. His name is there. 

Alexander Brass 3rd Row, L-R: Fourth Position

For generations, Indigenous people have contributed to Canada's military history. Many volunteered to serve in wars overseas, fought alongside Canadians and made extraordinary sacrifices. Yet their stories have often been overlooked, and the treatment they received when they returned home is a chapter of Canadian history that deserves far more attention.

For me, this isn't simply a historical discussion.

It's family.

On Indigenous Veterans Day, I want to tell the story of my great-grandfather, Alexander Brass. His life connects the First World War, Peepeekisis Cree Nation, the File Hills Colony Experiment and the policies that continued to restrict First Nations people long after the war ended.

His story is about courage and service. It is also about promises, lost opportunities and the contradiction of fighting for a country that did not recognize you as an equal.

Indigenous people answered the call

Indigenous people have served in Canada's military for generations.

During the First World War, thousands of First Nations men volunteered for military service. Estimates indicate that more than 4,000 Indigenous people enlisted, with approximately one-third of First Nations men of military age volunteering.

They served in the Canadian Expeditionary Force and participated in some of the most difficult battles of the war.

They were soldiers, scouts, snipers, interpreters and members of support units.

They brought their skills, knowledge and courage to the battlefield.

But there was a contradiction that followed many of these men.

They were prepared to defend Canada, even while their own communities were subjected to government control, discrimination and restrictions under the Indian Act.

The country they were willing to defend did not extend the same freedoms and opportunities to them that other Canadians enjoyed.

That contradiction would become particularly apparent when they returned home.

PHOTO: Alexander Brass Attestation. Military Record: (Canadian War Project)

Corporal Alexander Brass: A farmer, an interpreter and a soldier

My great-grandfather, Alexander Brass, was connected to the File Hills community in Saskatchewan and Peepeekisis Cree Nation.

According to our family's oral history, Alexander was brought into the community to serve as an interpreter. Through the government's process, he became one of the men associated with the File Hills Colony Experiment.

He became a farmer.

And by what has been passed down through our family, he was a very good one.

To understand Alexander's life, we need to understand what the File Hills Colony actually was.                        

Established under Indian Agent William Morris Graham beginning in 1898, the File Hills Scheme brought graduates of government industrial schools to Peepeekisis to establish farms. The stated objective was to extend their agricultural training and encourage assimilation into non-Indigenous society.

William Morris Graham - File Hlls Indian Agent

PHOTO: WILLIAM MORRIS GRAHAM, INDIAN AGENT

The government viewed the colony as an experiment in Indigenous agricultural development.

But there was another side to that story.

The colony was established on Peepeekisis reserve land without the informed consent of the original Band. Agricultural lots were allocated to people who originally belonged to other First Nations, and the population and membership of the community were fundamentally changed.

The Indian Claims Commission investigated the history and concluded that the Crown had breached its legal and fiduciary obligations to Peepeekisis.

Its 2004 report documented how the Department of Indian Affairs supported Graham's scheme and how the original members gradually lost control over their own reserve.

This was not simply a farming initiative.

It changed the land, membership, governance and identity of Peepeekisis.

And Alexander's story unfolded within that environment.

From the File Hills to the battlefields of Europe

Alexander eventually enlisted in the Canadian military.

Historical accounts connect him to the 68th Battalion Band Corps before his transfer to the 5th Battalion of the Canadian Expeditionary Force, known as the Fighting Fifth.

He served in Belgium and France during the First World War.

In 1917, during the fighting at Passchendaele, he was wounded.

Accounts of his service describe him remaining wounded in the trenches for four days before being transported for medical treatment. His injuries affected him for the rest of his life.

He eventually returned to Canada in 1919.

Alexander was a decorated soldier.

There is something important about the experience of Indigenous men who served overseas that deserves more attention. For many, military service provided an environment where their abilities, courage and contributions were recognized alongside those of other Canadians.

They were soldiers.

They were comrades.

They were trusted with responsibilities that demanded extraordinary courage.

Our family oral history tells us that Alexander was promised land of his own outside the reserve in recognition of his military service and decorations.

Think about what that would have meant to a young farmer.

Land represented independence, economic opportunity and the ability to determine his own future.

It was something he had worked hard for.

Yet returning home would reveal that the equality he experienced in uniform did not necessarily follow him back to Canada.

The Indian pass system: A veteran who needed permission to travel

One of the most difficult parts of this history is understanding the Indian pass system.

After the 1885 North-West Resistance, federal Indian Affairs officials began enforcing restrictions on First Nations people's movement on and off reserves.

The pass system required First Nations people to obtain written permission from an Indian Agent before leaving their reserve.

There was no legislation formally establishing this system. It was an administrative practice enforced by government officials and, in some circumstances, police.

But the absence of legislation did not mean the absence of control.

An Indian Agent could exercise considerable authority over a person's ability to travel, visit family, seek employment, attend gatherings or conduct business outside the reserve.

The system was designed to restrict movement and maintain government control over First Nations communities.

According to our family history, Alexander experienced the contradiction of returning from military service having been treated as an equal among his fellow soldiers, only to return to a country where his freedom of movement remained restricted because he was First Nations.

Imagine that.

You can travel across an ocean to fight in a world war, but when you return home, you may need written permission from a government official to leave your own community.

That is not equality.

And it is an important part of the story of Indigenous veterans that Canada needs to confront.

William Morris Graham and the File Hills Colony

We also need to talk about William Morris Graham.

His name appears repeatedly in the history of Peepeekisis.

He was the Indian Agent responsible for establishing the File Hills Colony, and the 2004 Indian Claims Commission report documents his extensive authority over the lives and affairs of the community.

The farming colony was presented as a successful government experiment. Its agricultural production and the achievements of its farmers were used to demonstrate the supposed success of the government's assimilation policies.

But what did that success look like for the original Peepeekisis families?

The historical record tells us that reserve land was subdivided and allocated to newcomers, that the original members were increasingly marginalized, and that the government's actions fundamentally changed the community.

Family accounts also describe an Indian Agent who treated First Nations people poorly in their everyday lives, yet presented the community differently when royalty or other important visitors came to the area.

There is a distinction worth remembering between what government officials wanted visitors to see and what community members experienced.

A successful farming operation could be displayed as evidence of government progress, while the people living within that system continued to experience restrictions on their independence and rights.

That is an important part of understanding the File Hills Colony.

The land question: Who benefited when Indigenous soldiers returned?

There is another historical issue that makes Alexander's experience particularly important.

It concerns the treatment of returning Indigenous veterans and the transfer of First Nations reserve lands for non-Indigenous soldier settlement.

A June 1988 article published in Saskatchewan Indian, titled "Indian Land Was Lost for Non-Indian Soldier Settlement," documents how reserve lands across Western Canada were surrendered or acquired for the settlement of non-Indigenous veterans following the First World War.

Historian Sarah Carter examined this policy in her research, "An Infamous Proposal: Prairie Indian Reserve Land and Soldier Settlement after World War I."

Her research documents how the federal government actively pursued the acquisition of reserve land for non-Indigenous returning soldiers.

More than 85,000 acres of Indian reserve land across Western Canada were acquired for non-Indigenous soldier settlement in the years following the war.

The contradiction is difficult to ignore.

First Nations men had volunteered to fight for Canada. Yet Indigenous veterans did not enjoy equivalent access to the land settlement opportunities available to many other returning soldiers.

Some received limited assistance through Indian Affairs, while others faced restrictions that made accessing the same opportunities extremely difficult.

The government was prepared to facilitate access to reserve lands for non-Indigenous veterans, while Indigenous veterans continued to face a system that restricted their economic independence.

For Alexander, this issue is particularly meaningful.

Our family history tells us he had been promised land of his own outside the reserve in recognition of his military service.

We should be careful not to assume that the broader soldier settlement policy explains exactly what happened to his individual land promise. His personal circumstances require their own documentation.

But the wider policy tells us something important about the environment into which he returned.

He had served.

He had been wounded.

He had earned recognition.

And he still faced a system that did not offer First Nations veterans the same opportunities as other Canadians.

The children of File Hills: Another part of the same history

There is another part of the File Hills history that cannot be separated from the broader experience of Peepeekisis and neighbouring communities.

The File Hills Indian Residential School operated from 1889 until 1949.

Children from Peepeekisis, Okanese, Star Blanket and other neighbouring communities attended the institution.

The school was part of the residential school system that separated Indigenous children from their families, languages, cultures and communities.

The children were subjected to institutional discipline and forced assimilation. Historical accounts also document inadequate food, illness, unsafe conditions and the use of student labour.

Research published through the University of Regina's Shattering the Silence project helps document this history.

I also want to recognize the work of members of our own community who have researched and written about the File Hills experience.

These are not simply academic subjects.

They are our families.

They are our Elders.

They are the experiences that shaped the community generations before us.

The Colony Experiment, the residential school system and the pass system were distinct policies and institutions, but they operated within the same broader colonial framework.

Understanding one helps us understand the environment in which the others operated.

The photograph that brings this history home

I keep coming back to that photograph.

The historical image of the File Hills Colony soldiers and their families, dating to approximately 1916–1917, identifies Alexander Brass by name.

He is listed in the third row, among the men who served.

Seeing his name in that historical record means something to me.

For many Indigenous families, historical photographs have been passed down without complete identification. Names and stories can disappear over time.

But here we have an archival record connecting Alexander to his community and his military service.

He was not just another soldier in a photograph.

He was my great-grandfather.

And his story deserves to be told.

Remembering Corporal Alexander Brass

When I think about Alexander, I think about more than his military service.

I think about the interpreter who came to Peepeekisis.

I think about the farmer who worked the land.

I think about the soldier who crossed the ocean and fought in Europe.

I think about the injuries he carried home.

And I think about the promises of opportunity and independence that our family remembers, set against the reality of the government restrictions he continued to face.

His life is connected to a much larger history of Indigenous people who served Canada while their own rights and freedoms remained restricted.

That is why Indigenous Veterans Day matters.

It gives us an opportunity to recognize the First Nations, Inuit and Métis veterans who served in the First World War, the Second World War, Korea, peacekeeping missions and military operations around the world.

It also reminds us that military service does not end when a soldier comes home.

Families and communities carry those experiences forward. They remember the sacrifices, the injuries, the losses and the challenges of rebuilding a life.

We owe those veterans more than a ceremonial thank-you.

We owe them the truth about their history.

Today, I honour my great-grandfather, Corporal Alexander Brass.

I honour Peepeekisis Cree Nation and the generations of families who have carried these stories forward.

I honour all Indigenous veterans who served this country, and those who

___________________________________________________

There is much more to this story.

I have much more to share about my great-grandfather, Corporal Alexander Brass, the File Hills Colony Experiment, the Indian Agent, the Canadian government and the policies that shaped the lives of our families and communities.

This is also a personal journey for me. It is about understanding where my family came from, what our ancestors experienced, what was taken from our communities, and how that history continues to shape who we are today.

These stories deserve to be told. Not just through government records and historical documents, but through the voices, memories and experiences of the families who lived them.

This is only the beginning.

Stay tuned. There is much more of this history to uncover, share and remember.

Friday, July 31, 2026

INAN - Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs - Notable Nunavut MP Lori Idlout Addition and News

Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs (INAN)

House of Commons INAN Committee

As of May 26, 2026 
INDIGPOLI UPDATE: August 1, 2026




Big, but not surprising news former NDP MP Lori Idlout crossed the floor to Liberal Party of Canada in March of this year. 

As I have mentioned before on this blog, Nunavut is a federal electoral district that has often had very pragmatic MPs. In the past Nunavut federal riding has been considered a bellwether riding and it tends to elect people who can influence their caucus, parliament and government with a goal to represent the needs of the people of Nunavut. 

With a whopping 2,093,000 square kilometres, Nunavut federal riding is the most massive riding by geographic size. It is also has the most Indigenous people by per capita. For most of it's history, this artic riding has had a member in the governing caucus. With the NDP catching holding the riding for periods in between. 

New Liberal MP Lori Idlout who is Inuk bring the federal Liberal Indigenous Caucus to six MPs, this is the first time the Liberal Caucus has had an Inuk MP since former MP, Hon. Hunter Tootoo. The Conservative party maintains it's four Indigenous MPs, two First Nation and two Inuit. The NDP maintain it's one First Nations MPs Leah Gazan (Winnipeg Centre). The House is down one Indigenous MP with Bloc First Nations MP Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay leaving in May 2026. 

Update on Indigenous Member of Parliament coming soon with more comprehensive updates on what they have been up to.  

________________________________________________________________

Lori Idlout takes on major gains for her self, her constituency and her party. 

National Defence is one of the most important file and priorities of Marc Carney, Lori Idlout appointment to two House committees is pretty important for her political career and her Nunavut constituency and citizens.

Changes to  Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs (INAN) makes changes with the addition of Lori Idlout and . 

With Liberal MP Jaime Battiste and Conservative MP Billy Morin, that brings three Indigenous MPs now sitting in the INAN committee. The Liberal presence on INAN increased by one seat to 7 Liberals, Four Conservatives and one Bloc member and welcomes a Inuk member. 

In addition, Lori Idout has been appointed to the House of Commons Committee on National Defence (NDDN). She is the only Indigenous person on this committee. 



Update in progress.

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

IndigPoli | Indigenous Politics Rebrand - Testing


 




INDIGPOLI REBRANDING IN PROCESS

FULL EXPLANATION COMING SOON


Monday, April 27, 2026

Leadership Beyond Partisanship: Wab Kinew, Team Canada, and the Evolution of Indigenous Leadership

Leadership Beyond Partisanship: Wab Kinew, Team Canada, and the Evolution of Indigenous Leadership




BY INDIGPOLI EDITORIAL DESK - JOSHUA BRASS-FRASER

MONDAY, APRIL 27, 2026

Across Canada, a new model of leadership is emerging—one that moves beyond partisanship and places Indigenous leadership at the centre of nation-building.

This shift also challenges a common misconception—that Indigenous leaders elected to public office will focus only on Indigenous issues, rather than representing all constituents.



As my great aunt, Eleanor Brass, wrote in I Walk in Two Worlds:

“It has never ceased to be interesting to be an Indian and to walk in two worlds—watching, learning and trying to understand the many cultures and the thinking of the various races of people.”

That insight remains deeply relevant today. As Indigenous peoples continue the work of decolonizing ourselves, we are also navigating and understanding non-Indigenous systems and perspectives.

For Indigenous leaders in public office, this means representing all constituents—while carrying the responsibilities and perspectives of First Nations into modern governance.

A Moment That Calls for Clarity

There’s something worth recognizing in how Wab Kinew has chosen to lead—particularly in his response to U.S. tariffs and the rhetoric of Donald Trump.

This isn’t symbolic politics. It is a coordinated economic and political response.

By maintaining Manitoba’s stance on U.S. liquor and tying normalization to the lifting of tariffs, Kinew has demonstrated a form of leadership that is grounded in strategy, not spectacle. It is a reminder that provincial leadership, when aligned with national interests, can play a meaningful role on the international stage.

The Return of “Team Canada”

What we are seeing emerge is something Canada does well—when it chooses to.

A “Team Canada” approach.

Leaders from different political traditions, including Premier Doug Ford, have shown a willingness to align behind Prime Minister Marc Carney in response to shared external pressure. This is not about ideology. It is about coordination, stability, and protecting Canadian interests.

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has acknowledged the benefit of a Team Canada approach working with Prime Minister Carney that brings trade deals and opportunity to Saskatchewan and Canada alike.

That is what mature governance looks like: recognizing when the moment demands unity over division.




A Question of Leadership in Alberta

This is where the contrast becomes more apparent. I don't want to give to much air to Danielle Smith's lack of Team Canada Spirit, so this why it's not an important piece of this blog. There are other Alberta Leader's that can be acknowledged like former Alberta Deputy Premier PC MLA Thomas Lukaszuk and his Forever Canadian ballot initiative. 

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has an opportunity to contribute to this unified front. At a time when external pressures—from tariffs to geopolitical uncertainty—require cohesion, a coordinated national approach may prove more effective than internal division.

This is not a question of political alignment. It is a question of strategic positioning.

Canada’s strength, particularly in moments like this, has always been its ability to act collectively.

Indigenous Leadership in a National Context

Kinew’s leadership also carries deeper significance.

As Canada’s first First Nations provincial premier, his role represents more than a political milestone—it reflects the continued evolution of Indigenous leadership within Canada’s governing institutions. This is not about representation alone; it is about influence, decision-making, and shaping outcomes that affect all Canadians.

His response to current pressures demonstrates that Indigenous leadership is not peripheral to national issues—it is central to them.

NOTABLE MANITOBA

Manitoba has proven to be a place for Indigenous leaders being elected to Public Office and elevated to higher office. In addition to the Premier there are four other Indigenous cabinet ministers.

  • Ian Bushie: Minister of Natural Resources and Indigenous Futures.
  • Nahanni Fontaine: Minister of Families.
  • Bernadette Smith: Minister of Housing, Addiction, and Homelessness.
  • Glen Simard: Minister of Sport, Culture, Heritage and Tourism 
Federally, the Hon. Rebecca Chartrand as Minister of Artic and Northern Affairs (and CanNor). She represents the electoral district of Churchill-Keewatinook Aski. Prior to election Tina Keeper and the late Elijah Harper were MPs for the same riding. This riding has the largest number of Indigenous people.

This leadership is not just symbolic—it is translating into real economic and nation-building projects.

Port of Churchill Project

Prime Minister Marc Carney and Premier Wab Kinew have signed a new agreement to fast-track major projects, including the Port of Churchill. By streamlining approvals, this partnership aims to unlock economic growth, strengthen northern trade corridors, and expand Canada’s global market access—positioning Manitoba as a key gateway for international trade.


This map is a simplified representation illustrating the potential for 
goods shipped from Churchill, Manitoba to reach global markets.

But this moment didn’t happen in isolation—it is built on decades of Indigenous leadership asserting its place within Canada.

From Meech Lake to Today: A Continuum of Leadership

Nearly 35 years ago, Elijah Harper stood in the Manitoba Legislature and halted the Meech Lake Accord.

It was a defining constitutional moment. Harper stood firm—often alone—in defence of First Nations and the broader integrity of Canada.

That moment reshaped the country.

Today, we are witnessing a different kind of moment. Not constitutional, but economic and political. Not defined by a single vote, but by coordinated leadership.

Harper asserted Indigenous and Canadian sovereignty in a constitutional context. Kinew is doing so in an economic one.

Not alone this time—but leading.




The Standard Moving Forward

Canada works best when it acts as a team.

That means premiers, regardless of political stripe, recognizing when the national interest requires coordination. It means aligning where it matters, even when disagreement exists elsewhere. Premier Wab Kinew shows the nation you can be an Indigenous Premier and leader can fight for Canada and Indigenous peoples rights at the same time, it's not mutually exclusive. 

This is the standard.

And in this moment, Wab Kinew is meeting it.

From Elijah Harper’s stand in 1990 to today’s nation-building partnerships, Indigenous leadership is not on the margins of Canada—it is helping define its future.


Monday, April 13, 2026

Liberals Poised to Sweep GTA Seats While Terrebonne Rematch Hinges on Every Vote By IndigPoli

Liberals Poised to Sweep GTA Seats While Terrebonne Rematch Hinges on Every Vote By IndigPoli

HOW THE LIBERAL MAJORITY WILL BE ACHIEVED

The Path to a Majority—Without a General Election

The Liberals appear poised to sweep two Greater Toronto Area (GTA) by-election seats tonight, reinforcing what has long been considered a Liberal fortress in urban Ontario.

With strong historical voting patterns in both ridings, the party is expected to add two more MPs to its caucus with little resistance.

But tonight is about more than just two safe seats.

If those results hold, the Liberals move closer to something much larger:

A majority government—without a general election.

In Canada’s parliamentary system, a party forms a majority by holding 172 seats in the House of Commons. With recent floor crossings from both the Conservatives and the NDP, combined with tonight’s expected gains, the Liberals are on the verge of crossing that threshold.

This is not a traditional electoral wave.

It is, in many ways:

A “war of attrition” majority—built seat by seat inside Parliament.

 


Our prediction: a Liberal sweep—and three (above) strong, capable female MPs heading to the House of Commons.

But Terrebonne remains a true battleground. Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné and the Bloc Québécois could still secure a razor-thin victory.

Regardless of the outcome, the math favours the Liberals. Two seats are enough for a majority. And if the The Globe and Mail report on additional floor crossings proves accurate, Prime Minister Mark Carney could soon be governing with greater stability.

Because in a race like this—especially in Terrebonne—
every vote matters.



GTA Strongholds: A Likely Liberal Sweep

The two Toronto-area ridings are widely expected to remain Liberal.

These seats represent:

  • Deep organizational strength
  • Long-standing voter alignment
  • Limited opposition pathways

Barring a major upset, the Liberals will add two MPs tonight, tightening their grip on the House.


All Eyes on Terrebonne

The real story tonight is unfolding in Terrebonne, Quebec.

This by-election is not just competitive—it is a rematch of one of the closest elections in Canadian history.

In the 2025 federal election:

  • Liberal candidate Tatiana Auguste was declared the winner
  • Margin of victory: 1 vote

That result stunned the Bloc Québécois, who had held Terrebonne as a safe seat since 1993.

However, in November 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada overturned the result, ordering a new election.

Prime Minister Mark Carney scheduled this rematch alongside two other by-elections—setting up tonight’s high-stakes vote.

Adding to the drama:

All major parties have kept their 2025 candidates.

This is a rare true electoral replay.


🪶 The Indigenous Vote: Small Numbers, Big Impact

This is one of those elections where it must be said clearly:

The Indigenous vote DOES matter.

Terrebonne has an Indigenous population of approximately:

  • 1,500+ people
  • Roughly 1.3% of the riding

On paper, that may seem small.

But in a riding decided by one vote, it becomes decisive.

Indigenous voting patterns are not monolithic. While some voters in Quebec have historically supported the Bloc, recent federal shifts suggest fluidity.

  • Five Indigenous Liberal MPs were elected in 2025
  • More recently, Lori Idlout crossed the floor, raising questions about shifting political alignment

It’s too early to call it a trend—but:

Terrebonne may offer an early signal.


Floor Crossings: A Canadian Tradition

For those questioning how a majority can emerge this way, it’s important to understand:

Floor crossings are not new in Canadian politics.

Notable example:

  • In 2005, Conservative MP Belinda Stronach crossed to the Liberals
  • Her move helped Paul Martin’s government survive a crucial vote

Historically, both major parties have:

  • Benefited from floor crossings
  • Used them to maintain or shift power

While controversial, they remain a legitimate feature of the parliamentary system.


The Numbers Tonight

If the Liberals:

  • Win both GTA ridings (expected), and
  • Win Terrebonne (competitive),

They reach:

~174 seats → Clear majority government

If they lose Terrebonne:

~173 seats → Still a functional majority
(especially when factoring in the Speaker)


Final Thoughts

Toronto may be predictable tonight.

Terrebonne will not be.

And while this path to a majority may be unconventional, it is entirely constitutional—and politically significant.

We will be watching closely—not just how Canadians respond, but how:

Indigenous voters and communities shape outcomes in razor-thin races.

Because in Terrebonne, as we’ve already seen:

Every vote matters.

______________

IndigPoli Insight

IndigPoli will continue to track how Indigenous political influence shapes outcomes—not just in large numbers, but in decisive moments.


Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Mapping Indigenous Representation in Canada’s House of Commons - Lori Idlout's floor cross makes a difference in the North!

12 Indigenous MPs in Canada's House of Commons. 

By Joshua Brass Fraser for Indigenous Politics Blog
March 11, 2025

Map created by Joshua Fraser for the Indigenous Politics (#IndigPoli) project tracking Indigenous representation in Canada’s Parliament.*If you would like to use this specific map (above), please contact us for permission. 

Indigenous political representation in Canada is no longer confined to a handful of northern ridings. Today, Indigenous Members of Parliament represent constituencies that stretch from the Arctic to Atlantic Canada and across major urban centres in the West and Prairies. Their presence reflects both the geographic diversity of Indigenous peoples and the growing influence of Indigenous leadership in Canada’s federal politics.

As of March 2026, 12 Indigenous MPs sit in Canada’s House of Commons, representing ridings across four different political parties. Mapping these ridings reveals something deeper than simple electoral geography: a northern arc of Indigenous-majority constituencies spanning the country, alongside a growing presence of Indigenous representatives in major Canadian cities.


Recent political developments have further elevated the national importance of this representation. With Lori Idlout joining the Liberal caucus, Canada’s largest riding—Nunavut—now sits closer to the centre of government at a time when Arctic sovereignty, northern infrastructure, and the future of the Northwest Passage are becoming increasingly important national priorities.

Mapping Indigenous Representation in Canada’s House of Commons

From Nunavut to Nova Scotia, Indigenous MPs now represent ridings across the country

As of March 11, 2026, 12 Indigenous Members of Parliament sit in Canada’s House of Commons, representing ridings from the Arctic to Atlantic Canada and across four different political parties. Their presence reflects the evolving geography of Indigenous political leadership in Canada.

A map of these MPs reveals two distinct patterns of representation: a northern arc of Indigenous-majority ridings and a growing number of urban Indigenous representatives in major Canadian cities.

A Northern Arc of Indigenous Representation

Several of the ridings represented by Indigenous MPs form what might be described as a northern political corridor stretching across Canada. These include large and geographically expansive ridings such as Nunavut, Churchill–Keewatinook Aski in northern Manitoba, Desnethé–Missinippi–Churchill River in northern Saskatchewan, and Abitibi–Baie-James–Nunavik–Eeyou in northern Quebec.

These ridings share several characteristics. They cover vast geographic areas, contain many remote communities, and often include large Indigenous populations. In some cases, Indigenous peoples represent a majority of residents and voters, giving these communities a significant influence in federal elections.

These northern districts also play an increasingly important role in Canada’s national conversation about sovereignty, resource development, and Arctic policy.

Urban Indigenous Representation Is Growing

At the same time, Indigenous political leadership is increasingly visible in urban ridings such as Winnipeg Centre, Edmonton Northwest, and Vancouver Quadra.

This shift reflects broader demographic changes. Today, more than half of Indigenous people in Canada live in urban areas, and Indigenous political participation is expanding accordingly. Urban Indigenous MPs often bring perspectives shaped by housing, economic development, and the realities of Indigenous life in Canadian cities.

Together, these northern and urban patterns show that Indigenous representation in Parliament is no longer limited to a handful of remote districts. Instead, it reflects the full geographic diversity of Indigenous peoples across Canada.

Nunavut, Arctic Sovereignty, and the Northwest Passage

Recent political developments have added another important dimension to this discussion. Nunavut MP Lori Idlout recently joined the Liberal caucus, bringing Canada’s largest riding more directly into the governing party’s parliamentary discussions.

This change comes at a moment when Canada is increasingly focused on Arctic sovereignty and the strategic importance of the Northwest Passage, particularly as global trade routes evolve and climate change makes Arctic navigation more viable.

In this context, Inuit communities are central to Canada’s presence in the Arctic. The longstanding principle often expressed in northern policy discussions is that “sovereignty begins with the people who live there.” Inuit communities have lived across the Arctic for generations, maintaining deep knowledge of the land, sea, and environmental conditions. Their presence and stewardship are a fundamental part of Canada’s Arctic identity.

The Inuit Connection Between Nunavut and Greenland

Nunavut also sits within a broader circumpolar Indigenous world. Both Nunavut and Greenland have overwhelmingly Inuit populations—approximately 85–90 percent of residents in each territory identify as Inuit. This shared cultural foundation creates a natural connection between the two regions.

Inuit across the Arctic share language roots, cultural traditions, and long-standing relationships that predate modern national borders. As Arctic governance and economic development increasingly become topics of international discussion, these Inuit connections between Canada and Greenland may become even more relevant.

Understanding these relationships is important not only for cultural recognition but also for policymaking. Inuit perspectives are essential to conversations about Arctic sovereignty, environmental stewardship, and northern economic development.

A National Indigenous Political Presence

Taken together, the current map of Indigenous MPs illustrates how Indigenous representation is becoming a national phenomenon rather than a regional one. Indigenous MPs now represent ridings in the North, the Prairies, British Columbia, Quebec, Ontario, and Atlantic Canada.

Their presence reflects changing demographics, growing Indigenous political participation, and the increasing importance of Indigenous leadership in Canada’s political landscape.

As Canada continues to grapple with issues such as reconciliation, Arctic sovereignty, and economic development in Indigenous territories, the perspectives of these MPs will likely play an increasingly important role in shaping the national conversation.


Indigenous Representation and Canada’s Constitutional Framework

The presence of Indigenous MPs in Canada’s Parliament also reflects a deeper constitutional reality. The Constitution Act, 1982 recognizes three distinct Indigenous peoples—First Nations, Inuit, and Métis—in Section 35, affirming the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of Indigenous peoples across the country.

While Members of Parliament are elected to represent all constituents within their ridings, Indigenous MPs often bring perspectives shaped by treaty relationships, Indigenous governance traditions, and the lived realities of their communities. Their presence in the House of Commons adds an important dimension to national debates about reconciliation, land stewardship, economic development, and the future of the Arctic.

In many cases, these MPs represent regions where Indigenous nations have long-standing relationships with the Crown through treaties, modern land claim agreements, or self-government arrangements. As a result, discussions in Parliament about infrastructure, resource development, northern policy, and environmental protection frequently intersect with Indigenous rights and governance.

The increasing presence of Indigenous representatives in federal politics therefore reflects more than changing electoral demographics. It also mirrors a broader recognition that Indigenous peoples are central to Canada’s political, legal, and constitutional landscape.

As Canada continues to navigate issues ranging from reconciliation to Arctic sovereignty, the perspectives and leadership of Indigenous Members of Parliament will remain an important part of the national conversation.

Closing thought: Understanding where Indigenous MPs represent Canadians is one way to better understand how Indigenous political leadership is shaping the country today.